Who is Julie Swetnick, the third Kavanaugh accuser.? Julie Swetnick, a customer of attorney Michael Avenatti, alleged in a signed assertion launched Wednesday that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh would drink to extra and “engage in abusive behaviorR21; toward teenage ladies while he was in high school.
In an announcement released via Avenatti, Swetnick said that in the 1980s, she witnessed efforts with the aid of Kavanaugh and his classmate Mark Judge to get the teenage female “inebriated and disoriented so they could then be 216;gang-raped217; in an aspect room or bedroom by using a 216;train217; of several boys.R21;
“I have an association recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these events waiting for their ‘turn’ with a lady internal the room. These boys blanketed Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh,” she alleged in the statement.
Swetnick alleged she grew to become a victim of “one of these ‘gang’ or ‘train’ rapes.” She did no longer say Kavanaugh or Judge sexually assaulted her.
Swetnick, a resident of Washington, said she was once a graduate of Gaithersburg High School in Maryland. She holds safety clearances for her work with the Treasury Department, U.S. Mint and the IRS.
Kavanaugh was known as Swetnick’s allegations “ridiculous” in a statement launched with the aid of the White House on Wednesday.
“This is ridiculous and from the Twilight Zone,” he said. “I don’t understand who this is, and this never happened.”
President Donald Trump did not address Swetnick’s allegations, but he did knock her lawyer, Avenatti, in a tweet Wednesday afternoon. Avenatti also represents porn superstar Stormy Daniels in her court cases towards Trump.
“Avenatti is a 0.33 charge legal professional who is correct at making false accusations as he did on me and like he is now doing on Judge Brett Kavanaugh,” the president tweeted. “He is simply looking for interest and doesn’t favor human beings to appear at his previous file and relationships – a whole low-life!”
“You don’t get an awful lot worse,” the president stated of the California lawyer.
In the face of the new allegations in opposition to Kavanaugh, the Democrats of the Senate Judiciary Committee known as on Trump to both withdraw Kavanaugh’s nomination or to direct the FBI to reopen an investigation into his background.
“Judge Kavanaugh is being considered for a promotion. He is asking for a lifetime appointment to the nation’s highest court docket the place he will have the opportunity to rule on things that will influence Americans for decades,” they wrote in a declaration Wednesday. “The well known of personality and health for a position on the nation’s very best courtroom should be higher than this.”
Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., a member of the Judiciary Committee, said he expects the committee to vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination Friday.
“But those of us on the committee have to be prepared for the possibility, certainly the likelihood, that there will be no definitive solutions to the very large questions before us,” he stated on the Senate floor.
“The committee has written a letter to Avenatti asking him if he can produce his consumer for an interview below oath,” stated Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, the GOP whip and a member of the Judiciary Committee, “as quickly as she can prepare to discuss to the staff.”
Cornyn did no longer point out that Swetnick wished to furnish her declaration before the Judiciary Committee used to be set to vote Friday. He said it would be days earlier than the full Senate took up the nomination, “so there’s plenty of time.”
“We’re not going to vote on affirmation until Tuesday, so there’s lots of time for that interview to take place, and I suspect that the longer this hangs out there, the more accusations will occur,” he said.
“But obviously, I take it significantly and agree with that it must be investigated with the aid of the committees,’’ said Collins, a key vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination.
“Under no situations ought to Brett Kavanaugh be validated absent a full and complete investigation,” he said on Twitter.
Avenatti stated he is ready for a response from Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, over Swetnick’s allegations about Kavanaugh. He covered emails he exchanged with Grassley’s personnel this week.
Grassley reiterated on Twitter that the allegations against Kavanaugh and different leads were being investigated through his committee staff, as nicely as dealers distinct from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Two different women, Christine Blasey Ford, and Deborah Ramirez have come forward with allegations towards Kavanaugh. Ford alleged that Kavanaugh held her down and tried to do away with her garments whilst they have been both in high school. Ramirez alleged that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her whilst they had been learners at Yale University. Kavanaugh vehemently denied their allegations.
“There is no query in my thought that Mark Judge has enormous information concerning the conduct of Brett Kavanaugh during the 1980s, mainly as it relates to his moves towards women,” she said. Ford, the first female to accuse Kavanaugh of assault, alleged that Judge was once current for that incident.
Swetnick stated she attended greater than 10 events the place Kavanaugh and Judge had been consuming excessively and engaging in “highly inappropriate conduct, which include being overly aggressive with female and not taking ‘No’ for an answer.” The conduct covered grabbing female and fondling them except their consent, she said.