Who is Julie Swetnick, the third Kavanaugh accuser.? Julie Swetnick, a customer of attorney Michael Avenatti, alleged in a signed assertion launched Wednesday that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh would drink to extra and “engage in abusive behavior” toward teenage ladies while he was in high school.

In an announcement released via Avenatti, Swetnick said that in the 1980s, she witnessed efforts with the aid of Kavanaugh and his classmate Judge to the teenage female “inebriated and disoriented so they be ‘gang-raped’ in an aspect or bedroom by using a ‘train’ of several boys.”

“I an association recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these waiting for their ‘turn’ with a lady internal the room. These boys blanketed Judge and Brett Kavanaugh,” she alleged in the statement.

Swetnick alleged she grew to become a of “one of these ‘gang’ or ‘train’ rapes.” She did no longer say Kavanaugh or Judge sexually assaulted her.

Swetnick, a resident of Washington, said she was once a graduate of Gaithersburg High School in Maryland. She holds safety clearances for her work with the Treasury Department, U.S. Mint and the IRS.

Kavanaugh was known as Swetnick’s allegations “ridiculous” in a statement launched with the aid of the White House on Wednesday.

“This is ridiculous and the Twilight Zone,” he said. “I don’t understand who this is, and this never happened.”

Donald Trump did not address Swetnick’s allegations, but he did knock her lawyer, Avenatti, in a tweet Wednesday afternoon. Avenatti also represents porn superstar Stormy Daniels in her court cases towards Trump.

“Avenatti is a 0.33 legal professional who is correct at making false accusations as he did on me and like he is now doing on Judge Brett Kavanaugh,” the tweeted. “He is simply looking for interest and doesn’t favor human beings to at his previous file and relationships – a whole -life!”

Trump’s persisted his assault in a news conference Wednesday afternoon in New York, announcing Avenatti had a “bad reputation” and was once a “con artist.”

“You don’t an awful worse,” the stated of the California lawyer.

In the face of the new allegations in opposition to Kavanaugh, the Democrats of the Senate Judiciary Committee known as on Trump to both withdraw Kavanaugh’s nomination or to direct the FBI to reopen an into his background.

“Judge Kavanaugh is being considered for a promotion. He is asking for a lifetime appointment to the nation’s highest court docket the place he will the opportunity to rule on things that influence Americans for decades,” they wrote in a declaration Wednesday. “The well known of personality and health for a position on the nation’s very best courtroom should be higher than this.”

Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., a member of the Judiciary Committee, said he expects the committee to vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination Friday.

“But those of us on the committee to be prepared for the possibility, certainly the likelihood, that there be no definitive to the very large questions before us,” he stated on the Senate floor.

“The committee written a letter to Avenatti asking him if he produce his consumer for an interview below oath,” stated Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, the GOP whip and a member of the Judiciary Committee, “as quickly as she prepare to discuss to the staff.”

Cornyn did no longer out that Swetnick wished to furnish her declaration before the Judiciary Committee used to be set to vote Friday. He said it would be days earlier than the full Senate took up the nomination, “so there’s plenty of time.”

“We’re not going to vote on affirmation until Tuesday, so there’s lots of time for that interview to take place, and I suspect that the longer this hangs out there, the more accusations occur,” he said.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said she deliberate to learn Swetnick’s declaration.

“But obviously, I take it significantly and agree with that it must be investigated with the aid of the committees,’’ said Collins, a key vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination.

Avenatti was known as for an FBI into Swetnick’s allegations.

“Under no situations ought to Brett Kavanaugh be validated absent a full and complete investigation,” he said on Twitter.

Avenatti stated he is ready for a response Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, Swetnick’s allegations Kavanaugh. He covered emails he exchanged with Grassley’s personnel this week.

Grassley reiterated on Twitter that the allegations against Kavanaugh and different leads were being investigated through his committee staff, as nicely as dealers distinct the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and U.S. Immigration and Enforcement.

Two different women, Christine Blasey Ford, and Deborah Ramirez come forward with allegations towards Kavanaugh. Ford alleged that Kavanaugh held her down and tried to do away with her garments whilst they been both in high school. Ramirez alleged that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her whilst they had been learners at Yale University. Kavanaugh vehemently denied their allegations.

In Swetnick’s statement, she said she met Kavanaugh and Judge in the early Eighties at a residence party. She described the two as “extremely shut friends.”

“There is no query in my thought that Judge enormous information concerning the conduct of Brett Kavanaugh during the 1980s, mainly as it relates to his moves towards women,” she said. Ford, the first female to accuse Kavanaugh of assault, alleged that Judge was once current for that incident.

Swetnick stated she attended greater than 10 the place Kavanaugh and Judge had been consuming excessively and engaging in “highly inappropriate conduct, which include being overly aggressive with female and not taking ‘No’ for an answer.” The conduct covered grabbing female and fondling them except their consent, she said.